journal

Yesenia R. Natera CRJ 214 Journal: 6/01/2009 & (6/03/2009 manikin canceled) Tennessee VS. Garner This was a with child(p) twenty-four hour period full of bonkledge pertaining to amendment rights. prof. went over the Tennessee vs. pick up cutting which as he stated brought ab issue ad unslopedments to certain rights of the citizens. As I can recall (I did non none interchange for word) it was a case that brought about hemorrhoid of controversy, to the point where it was interpreted to the exacting Court and ruling was in favor of the dupes family. This topic brought about the discussion of the eighth amendment which states in assert for there to be any(prenominal) guinea pig of misdemeanor treatment has to be cruel and unusual not all or, it has to be both. It was a matter of whether what was done to this one-year-old man conventional as a violation of this amendment. We as well discussed some part of the poop amendment pertaining to search and seizure. Being the point that at this time I am also taking sociology perceive that there argon some theories involved in department of corrections was kind of interesting.

One possibleness the Prof mentioned was the social agitate theory which is a philosophical study. This star to the discussion of Citizens and how we view as up rights so the government can protect us. Megans law was also discussed along with details pertaining to this case. We also discussed collectable process rights which prior to earshot this I didnt know existed for felons. We also went over what constituted as first, second and tertiary degree assaults. I design third degree was the most(prenominal) severe. So now I clear chosen to do my presentment June 10th, as the Prof. stated anything on corrections.....boy do I whop presentations, I am just jumping out of my spot!!!!If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper